Obama spoke out in support of the "Ground Zero Mosque", which as Gawker points out (in a hilarious piece on potential "compromises") could more accurately be called the "The Downtown Manhattan Muslim Community Center," but that doesn't do as much to justify faux outrage and calls to "refudiate." Seriously, thank goodness. Now could someone from the right prove their party isn't going over the waterfall of irrelevance by doing the same? Anyone?
Shelley O (The nickname is from TLo) took a trip to Spain, and now someone is comparing her to a modern day Marie Antoinette. Snarky columnists will be snarky columnists, but the part that really irks me, is that her approval ratings fell after the whole thing. Honestly, give me a break. She took a trip with her daughter and a few friends. Surely this is not unheard of from someone who earned over $300,000 a year as a vice president at University of Chicago Hospitals?
I'm about as pro-choice as they come (when it comes to legal restrictions) and yet I found myself tearing up reading this description of abortion (last page) in a piece on selective reduction of twins linked to by Jezebel. Jezebel's Anna North seems to ask whether we should judge one woman's choice in terms of how this informed our defense of her right to choose. But to me, the two can be unrelated. It's possible to feel sadness about abortion, and even to feel anger at the person doing it, without believing in legal restrictions on it. Going in with this belief, I was still surprised at how much the piece affected me emotionally. Go read it and let me know if your eyes stay dry.